sand hill advisors lawsuit

Brenda Vingiello In Support Of Motion To Compel Arbitration: Name Extension changed from OF FRANK D. RORIE JR. Summons on Complaint; Issued and Filed by: Adam B. 's Mot. Of Grand View, 84 Video/newsstand, Inc. v. Thomas Sartini. at 27:13-23 ("[W]e had been located at Sand Hill Road and actually were a very active part of the community around that area. 4.) To request information suppression, updates, or additions, contact us about this docket. The Court therefore addresses each prong of the test for service mark infringement to ascertain whether summary judgment is appropriate based on the record presented. STRUCK CAPITAL SPECIAL SITUATIONS MANAGEMENT LLC, DIVERGENCE DIGITAL CURRENCY MANAGEMENT LLC, 8/3/2021: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION), 2/3/2023: Notice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information, 10/12/2022: Notice - OF COURT ORDER CONTINUING CMC, 10/4/2022: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (STATUS CONFERENCE RE: ARBITRATION), 2/3/2022: Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (STATUS CONFERENCE RE: ARBITRATION), 7/8/2021: Declaration - DECLARATION OF FRANK D. RORIE JR. Filing 1 MOTION for a Protective Order - filed by Yida Gao, Sand Hill Advisors PR LLC, Shima Capital Management LLC. "Not surprisingly, under this standard, defendants are `rarely' awarded attorney fees in trademark infringement cases." %%EOF % (Miller, Katherine) (Filed on 2/3/2009) Modified on 2/4/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). Other business, many of which are located in the Silicon Valley (which encompasses the Sand Hill *1119 area), include "Sand Hill Angels," "Sand Hill Financial," "Sand Hill Finance," "Sand Hill Capital," "Sand Hill Econometrics," "Sand Hill Equity Research," "Sand Hill Partners," "Sand Hill Consulting Associates," and "Sand Hill Group LLC." The district court must review de novo "those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." at 115:11-22.) (Id. "); see also McCaffrey Depo. (Entered: 02/19/2009), CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 9/30/2009. Last Updated January 6, 2019 at 8:27 PM EST (4.3 years ago). (Id.). C at 80:1-82:9, Dkt. L.R. Entrepreneur Media, 279 F.3d at 1148. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2009) (Entered: 02/20/2009), STIPULATION and Proposed Protective Order, filed by Sand Hill Advisors LLC., Sand Hill Advisors LLC. Intern. Plaintiff also has made no showing that Plaintiff and Defendant attend the same networking events or that their "word-of-mouth" referrals involve the same demographic. The mere fact that a mark references a geographic location does not ipso facto lead to the conclusion that the mark is descriptive. E, F, H, K, L; Williams Depo. 79, Filing Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 11/19/09. 57. To establish service mark infringement under the Lanham Act, the plaintiff must show that (1) it has a valid, protectable mark, and (2) defendant's use of the mark is likely to cause confusion. 0000002583 00000 n United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division. Here, there is no dispute that "Sand Hill" refers to a geographical locale *1114 on or near Sand Hill Road in the Silicon Valley and that Plaintiff, in fact, chose "Sand Hill" because of its geographical significance. 0000000016 00000 n

Parker Dunshee Salary, Articles S