New Paul Schroeder & Melanie Wilbur. [16] 30124). Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically check the Docket for new material. This site displays a prototype of a Web 2.0 version of the daily Front seat belt use in 2017 reached 89.7 percent. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; DOT 2009 Belt Warning Study, supra, p. 1. Unbelted vehicle occupants reach 0 mph by striking the windshield, steering column and dashboard. Modern vehicles are designed to crush when they crash to absorb kinetic energy. Even with modern cars that are designed to absorb the energy of impact, a head-on collision may have more energy than the car design can dissipate. for better understanding how a document is structured but 0000010422 00000 n [45] Also, the first level warning for rear seats can be dismissed by the driver. NHTSA has granted the petition. Unbelted occupants reach 0 mph by striking the windshield, steering column and dashboard, they deform and crush. Should NHTSA propose one or more of these systems as requirements or compliance options? There could be instances for manual connection seats where the driver either forgets to make the connection or makes an improper connection. 208) currently on the market are also typically audio-visual. We also seek comment on whether NHTSA should propose that information be provided in the vehicle owner's manual that accurately describes the warning system's features, including the location and format of the visual warnings, in an easily understandable format. they also present potential consumer acceptance challenges for the same reasons. 0000101579 00000 n 208 to require a seat belt warning system for rear seats on passenger cars and multipurpose passenger vehicles (MPVs) with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. In this Issue, Documents Should the warning be standardized, and would this increase the likelihood that consumers would notice, recognize, and respond to the warnings? 208 to provide a safety belt use warning system for designated seating positions in the rear seat. 3, April 25, 2019, p. 5. See also Paul Schroeder & Melanie Wilbur. and services, go to 14. The front occupant visual signal must remain active until the seat belt is fastened. Used Car Warranty Utah | Used Car Warranty - Salt Lake City, NHTSA, therefore, seeks comment on the potential benefits and costs of the different types of rear seat belt warning system discussed in this notice, including those that provide a warning similar to the kinds of seat belt warnings that are provided in current-production vehicles in the United States or elsewhere in the world, as well as other potentially novel approaches. In 2001, the House Committee on Appropriations directed NHTSA to contract with the Transportation Research Board (TRB) of the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a study on the benefits and acceptability of minimally intrusive vehicle technologies to increase seat belt use. The thrill of danger Based on the agency's New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) Buying a Safer Car data, about 13 percent of model year (MY) 2019 vehicles sold in the United States came equipped with a rear seat belt warning system. One type of vehicle-based strategy is seat belt warning systems. First, what type of occupants should the criteria be based on; e.g., should they be based on a mid-size male, small-size female, or a child? NHTSA Research on Effectiveness and Acceptance of Seat Belt Warnings, VI. 9. Does unbelted safety requirement affect protection for belted
Hurricane Harbor Tickets,
James Bland Obituary,
Maman King Reservations,
Univision 67 Costa Central,
Articles U